top of page

MNML Tone vs. Cartessa Physiq: Why Simultaneous Energy Delivery Defines the Future of Body Contouring

  • Writer: Jack Burrows
    Jack Burrows
  • Aug 27
  • 3 min read

Updated: Sep 4


Cartessa Physiq entered the market as a body contouring system combining muscle stimulation and heating technology. For many practices, it seemed like a balanced approach: a platform that could tone muscle while also targeting fat. But beneath that promise lies a structural limitation that defines the device’s ceiling.


Physiq cannot deliver RF and EMS at the same time. Treatments are staged — heat, then muscle, then heat again. For providers, this means longer sessions, fragmented outcomes, and more opportunity for patients to disengage before they see results.


MNML Tone was designed differently. By delivering synchronized RF and EMS at a harmonized 2,000 Hz beat frequency, it addresses fat reduction, skin tightening, and muscle stimulation in a single, continuous session. The difference isn’t theoretical — it reshapes both patient experience and practice economics. Where Physiq forces a compromise, MNML Tone represents a step forward: an integrated platform that drives consistency, efficiency, and profitability.


The Core Limitation of Physiq

Physiq’s staged delivery model is its defining weakness. While it can apply energy for heating and later deliver electrical stimulation, the two are never harmonized. This separation has consequences:

- Extended treatment times: sessions require multiple cycles to deliver both modalities, often stretching past an hour.

- Patient comfort: stop-start protocols disrupt the natural flow of treatment, creating a less seamless experience.

- Clinical outcomes: without simultaneous delivery, the synergistic benefits of heat and muscle activation are lost.


For executives and reps evaluating device adoption, this limitation represents a fundamental barrier. Physiq does two things — but never together. And in aesthetics, integration is increasingly the differentiator that defines competitive advantage.


Why Simultaneous Delivery Matters


Body contouring is not just about surface results. It’s about efficiency, throughput, and sustained outcomes that keep patients returning. Simultaneous energy delivery enhances each of these factors:


Efficiency: Combining RF and EMS in one pass reduces chair time, freeing schedules and enabling practices to see more patients.


Synergy: When heating and muscle contractions occur together, muscle fibers are more receptive, fat metabolism is accelerated, and skin tissue benefits from consistent stimulation.


Retention: Patients feel the difference in fewer sessions, reducing dropout and improving satisfaction rates.


This is where MNML Tone separates itself. It was engineered to integrate modalities seamlessly, creating layered outcomes without additional devices or extended protocols.


MNML Tone’s Integrated Advantage

MNML Tone is not simply another combination device. It is an integrated platform that delivers results in a way that reflects the realities of today’s aesthetic marketplace. With sealed applicators and synchronized RF + EMS at a 2,000 Hz beat frequency, treatments are deeper, smoother, and more consistent. Unlike Physiq, there is no compromise between heat and muscle activation — both occur simultaneously, producing outcomes that patients can see and feel faster.For providers, this integration translates into a competitive edge. Marketing a technology that performs three critical functions at once — fat reduction, skin tightening, and muscle stimulation — creates a simpler message for patients and a stronger value proposition for practices. It is not about claiming more features; it is about delivering them together in one efficient session.


The Market Context

The timing of this differentiation is critical. A new wave of patients, many of whom are on GLP-1 medications like semaglutide, are seeking comprehensive solutions for rapid fat loss, muscle atrophy, and skin laxity. These patients do not want piecemeal solutions. They want efficiency, comfort, and visible outcomes in as few sessions as possible.Physiq, with its staged delivery, is poorly positioned for this demographic. It addresses muscle and fat but cannot do so with the integration and efficiency that patients demand. MNML Tone, by contrast, was designed for this reality. Its simultaneous protocols address multi-dimensional concerns in a single treatment, making it a future-proof investment for providers.


Strategic Takeaway for Providers

The difference between Physiq and MNML Tone is not about incremental features — it is about design philosophy. Physiq attempts to bridge modalities but falls short by separating them. MNML Tone integrates them seamlessly, creating a patient experience and provider workflow that is faster, more efficient, and more profitable.


For savvy executives and reps, this distinction matters. It defines whether a device is a temporary solution or a sustainable platform. Physiq forces compromise. MNML Tone eliminates it.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page